New Reply

Post a Reply

Thread: Reviewing 2007 ATP tour

Title: (100 characters at most)

Content: ( 3,000 characters at most, please )

You can add emoticons below to your post by clicking them.

[quote=CANADAGUY,260935]Hi Katrina,

>>I guess that I understand why you say Grand Slams are superior to the Masters Series. If you can win Grand Slams, that means you are really a all-round tennis player since you can play well on grass, clay and hard tennis court.<<

Well, that's not quite what I meant. There are Master series events on different surfaces too. I simply wanted to let you know that the Grand Slams are played on
different surfaces and that most players prefer one surface over another.

But the main reason that the Grand Slams are more important than the Master Series events is because of their history. They have been around much longer. Wimbledon is over 100 years old! The French Open is close to 100 years old. The U.S Open and the  
Australian Open have been around for decades.

The Master Series however is really quite new. It's only been around for about 15 years.

Yes it's true, in any big sport, a champion can cash in with endorsements and become very rich today.

The Olympics are another area where winning gold usually translates into lots of money! Well at least it does in the West.  :)

[/quote]

characters left

Name:

Get a new code