New Reply

Post a Reply

Thread: Times: Who will be Person of the Year 2009?

Title: (100 characters at most)

Content: ( 3,000 characters at most, please )

You can add emoticons below to your post by clicking them.

[quote=MARRIE,383416]<<However, as you rightly point out some good has been achieved, but at a huge cost. On this subject we will just have to agree to disagree.>>

Bob, the ideal conditions allows one person rational decision. However it's not realistic, we become associated for variouse reasons with various conflicts among us. Hence a game begins.  If each of us plays strong, none of us is better of,which is nash equilibrium which results from human nature and happens the most.   Another situation is like one side plays coorperatively, the other side reason that it will still play strong getting more pay off than that when it will choose coorperation.  However, this situation won't last long.  The best game with both parties better off (max. pay off) is compromising and cooperatiive  between with agreement and enforcement of rules,  The war (game)you just mentioned is Nash Equilibrium with too much cost.

<<I believe that if the commercial profit was removed from the selling of drugs, and by that I mean, hand it out for free, it would kill the trade overnight.>>

Dodger, you hit the nail.  ''the profit-the money (pay-off) is the roots of evil.  I should say there definitely exists complicated cause and effect relationship among 911, realestate bubble, financial system collapse, fighting for oil in middle east and war against terrorism.[/quote]

characters left

Name:

Get a new code