| Mig-35 combat fighter | |
|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2008 04:17 | #11   |
| GUEST46132 | India with its fleet of MIG-35 and Su-30 MKI is really very strong and the SU-30 is also capable of carrying nuclear weapons . and itz very soon going to develop mca aircraft |
| Mar 21, 2008 05:06 | #12 |
| GUEST32184 | fast of all india still now does not have Mig-35 and the tender has just been floated....also isreal and russia has ASEA raders along with US |
| Mar 21, 2008 19:05 | #13 |
| GUEST59166 | I am not sure who has given you the wrong info. India does not have Mig 35. It wants to buy 120 some jets to replace the old Mig 21s but as of yet have not decided which aircraft they would by from the international tender. On the other hand Mig 29 fleet is getting an upgrade from Russia which will cost close to a Billion Dollars. They wont be called Mig 35 as the MIG 35 had a slightly different air fare as it uses thrust vectors. Not available on MIG 29. From What is understood is that the Mig 29 upgrade would make a huge difference as it will have brand new engine and radar that is used on the new MIG 35. |
| Mar 28, 2008 03:48 | #14 |
| GUEST15591 | F-16, J10 , FC-1 fighters is comparable to Mig 35 |
| Mar 28, 2008 03:56 | #15 |
| GUEST15594 | China should build new long rang bomber like B1, B2 or Tu-160. Produce J11b china indigenous su-27, J-10 and further XXJ-12,13,14 To counter india threat |
| May 7, 2008 01:24 | #16 |
| GUEST17156 | India does not have Mig 35 but I'do think they are most likely to chose Mig over the other fighters simply because there production facilities are a customed to Mig 29 so it won't be hard for them to adjust.Secondly russia will be willing to transfer alot of technology than USA will and thirdly India want's 126 fighters,if you do the maths, then the Mig it the only fighter they can get without being overbudget.China cannot build B1,B2 or Tu160 because they dont have the technology but if you give them 7 to10 years they will be able to do it. |
| May 14, 2008 14:48 | #17 |
| GUEST20224 | Very impressive bird! how much do they cost? Its the manufacturing quality of the air frame getting better with this new version? |
| May 22, 2008 13:02 | #18 |
| GUEST21254 | who d hell is maintainin this website. the contract for 126 jets is yet to be awarded. at presently we r lukin 4 various aircraft and we r not going to terrorize anyone mr. nemesis, we intend to protect our country from hostile nations and threats |
| Jun 6, 2008 04:00 | #19 |
| GUEST24686 | According to many defense strategists/analysts including many non Indians, the amount of, as well as the stretch of air-interests India needs to protect & support, requires for India, at least full 45 squadrons of fighter planes in good working condition. But according to latest reports, India have only around 30 squadrons of fighter planes. That too taking into account the obsolete and frighteningly malfunctioning Mig-21 fighters. If one counts them off then the number of squadrons reduces to a meagre 20 or so. With India's indigenously built LCA "Tejas" is not complete at all & lagging far behind schedule, one can understand that India needs these 126 fighter planes desperately. Another point is, India never had or ordered any Mig-35 as well as Su-33. India only have Mig-29 and Su-30. Only China have Su-33 and also probably Mig-35. China also have the latest Israeli fighters. Even China's self developed fighters are technically far superior & already in action, than what India's "Tejas" LCA is projected to be in 2012(the earliest projected launch time). So one can clearly see that India have not even completely secured its interests at home, let alone be a super power in the aerial combat section or even a threat(?). |
| Jul 6, 2008 11:04 | #20 |
| GUEST54137 | i am from pakistan let them come i say we don't have the mig 35s yet but we have very good sams but we have sus and mig 29s |
Post a Reply to: Mig-35 combat fighter
Copyright © 1998-2025 All rights reserved.