India will become the next Yugoslavia?

India will become the next Yugoslavia?
Nov 22, 2008 21:51
BITTERSWEET Points: Join Date: Sep 25, 2008 Status: offline	source: Chinese Millitary Forum In recent years, Asia, Africa, Europe and four countries (the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, Czech and Slovakia, Ethiopia) split. Although the causes of these separatist regions have different cultures, there are some common rules to follow: # D) rule: >>no basis in history, no culture, the entire nation lacks of unity and the pursuit of a sense of responsibility, sense of mission, split in the face of weakness. Personal view is that mainland India has not been a nation. Although the Hindu society in India playing a very important function of the swap, the biggest weakness of Hindu philosophy is deep-rooted fatalism, which has determine to hold this ideology of national unity is not an inherent power and as well there is no strong advocate of the separation. India, as a unity, has always been the pattern of external power (former British Master)。 India today is the so-called reunification of the British foreign forces together. Today it is also still maintained as unified erea because after the British left, for the time being no other forces involved in it. This country has no unified basis! Therefore, if the foreign forces left,Yudi, a unified situation will disintegrate, fragile! As long as the means to impose, they will unconditionally accept the political arrangements from external power, the Indians believe will quickly adapt to the new master of the rules!!! India has the inevitability of the split! First of all, after the British people departure of the Indian sub-continent, it's less likely that no other external forces intervened (former soviet union them usa); second, India is a departure from the traditional Asian values. Like Canada, India,being proud of a British Commonwealth (it's said to be disloved soon) country, has always be slaved by external power's ideology or rules, which is absolutely no good ending! India is a confederation of all ethnic groups, not federal! He may be able to build in the future similar to the Indian version of the Commonwealth of Independent States - a loose confederation of Hindu nationalism in the form. The next best is the result of the independent countries of the region similar to the European Union, the worst result of the disintegration of the entire Indian subcontinent, west and north-eastern region was the Islamic-oriented. In short, he could not have a lasting unification of China should be prepared! << This is an aggressive and interesting article, welcome free discussion!

Nov 22, 2008 21:51

BITTERSWEET
Points:
Join Date: Sep 25, 2008
Status: offline

source: Chinese Millitary Forum

In recent years, Asia, Africa, Europe and four countries (the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, Czech and Slovakia, Ethiopia) split. Although the causes of these separatist regions have different cultures, there are some common rules to follow:

# D) rule:

>>no basis in history, no culture, the entire nation lacks of unity and the pursuit of a sense of responsibility, sense of mission, split in the face of weakness. Personal view is that mainland India has not been a nation. Although the Hindu society in India playing a very important function of the swap, the biggest weakness of Hindu philosophy is deep-rooted fatalism, which has determine to hold this ideology of national unity is not an inherent power and as well there is no strong advocate of the separation. India, as a unity, has always been the pattern of external power (former British Master)。 India today is the so-called reunification of the British foreign forces together. Today it is also still maintained as unified erea because after the British left, for the time being no other forces involved in it.

This country has no unified basis! Therefore, if the foreign forces left,Yudi, a unified situation will disintegrate, fragile! As long as the means to impose, they will unconditionally accept the political arrangements from external power, the Indians believe will quickly adapt to the new master of the rules!!!

India has the inevitability of the split!

First of all, after the British people departure of the Indian sub-continent, it's less likely that no other external forces intervened (former soviet union them usa);

second, India is a departure from the traditional Asian values. Like Canada, India,being proud of a British Commonwealth (it's said to be disloved soon) country, has always be slaved by external power's ideology or rules, which is absolutely no good ending!

India is a confederation of all ethnic groups, not federal! He may be able to build in the future similar to the Indian version of the Commonwealth of Independent States - a loose confederation of Hindu nationalism in the form. The next best is the result of the independent countries of the region similar to the European Union, the worst result of the disintegration of the entire Indian subcontinent, west and north-eastern region was the Islamic-oriented. In short, he could not have a lasting unification of China should be prepared! <<

This is an aggressive and interesting article, welcome free discussion!

Nov 22, 2008 22:52	#1
MICECHOW Points: Join Date: Nov 5, 2007 Status: Offline	i dont think so!~

Nov 23, 2008 04:25

CARLOS
Points:
Join Date: Sep 10, 2007
Status: Offline

As I have understood there are some even difficult disagreements between different religions. Lately there has not been much actions committed by hindus or muslims. Anyway, I believe the situation is difficult all the time especially close to Pakistan border.

In case Yugoslavia would happen in India, might consequences be big, perhaps enormous. In history, when some country has gone weak, other country has attacked there and if it would happen to India, Pakistan would be there. In addition to that, must remember that after war between China and India 1962 some lines of border are debatable. Perhaps China would take advantance to "correct borderline".

Carlos

Dec 20, 2008 16:04	#3
GUEST78514	india has the only pluralistic, egalitarian, liberal, democratic, capitalist yet socialist society in the developing world. And it also has the worlds third largest armed force, this will never happen *** sorry you can continue your wet dream.

Oct 11, 2009 09:51	#4
RAKESHSEMWAL Points: Join Date: Oct 4, 2009 Status: Offline	Ha-ha I think you pick the wrong country “India” in your question, Just pick the history book and see what system these countries where following at that point of time when they collapsed? And then pick the countries those are following the similar system at this point of time, Make a list; those are countries eventually to collapse in near future. Hope you come back with the list.

Oct 11, 2009 15:30

GUEST98141

In all those example of countries above which got disintegrated, it is because of some external power. In case of Soviet-Union they had the provision of their individual republics opting for secession, so the countries like Georgia & Ukraine etc. decided to secede from S.U when Mikhail Gorbachev decided to end the Communist rule & formulate a democratic federal Russia instead. The same thing happened with most of the other countries initially which was later followed by some foreign intervention, like the creation of Kosovo (not recognised Internationally though) from Serbia by NATO.

In case of India it is already a democratic country and already got rid of their foreign master. One can consider that Pakistan & Bangladesh seceded from India, but only under foreign occupation, and it also applies to Myanmar/Burma (part of India till 1939). But it is also true that, with different people speaking at least 2-dozen established official languages, containing various tribes from Indo-African descent, Indo-European descent, Indo-Oriental descent etc., having been the birthplace to innumerable religions other than Hinduism, viz. Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Sufism etc & home to many other like 200-million Muslims (2nd largest Muslim population in the world after Indonesia), 50-million Christians (larger than Australia and New Zealand combined) as well as Parsis (Zoroastrians) larger in number than Iran (birthplace of Zoroastrianism) itself, India is a peculiar country like no other.

It is true that whenever the larger geographical area of the Continental India existed as a single political entity, it did so by formulating an Empire and never existed as a nation-state or kingdom, and so it can only exist as a Federation. The first few steps to Federalism is that of a common (and not joint) military, foreign policy and economic market, which are already complete. With common military and no external force, it is impossible to break India permanently, unless of course India's enemies decide to launch a combined joint attack on India from all the sides immediately. Now India needs to strengthen the above institutions as well as start giving more autonomy to its member states constitutionally. These are necessary not to prevent any break-up but to prosper as a Federation. In this way, future Federal India could have Myanmar/Burma, Nepal, Srilanka, Bhutan & probably other nation states as its member states with more autonomy. So the break-up story is a total flop.

Nov 10, 2009 06:55	#6
GUEST75142	Dear Chinese brother... just do a little experiment with your own article and you will come across a more genuine possibility... y dont u replace the word "india" with "china" and "hindu" with "han chinese" in your own article and read it once again... what you prophesise for india could be a future for china as well... lol...

Post a Reply to: India will become the next Yugoslavia?