Should China use force to re-take Nansha Islands? | |
---|---|
Apr 29, 2007 04:21 | |
![]() | Mechanical translation about these news: "China's Nansha Islands and their adjacent waters is indisputable sovereignty At 2:22 p.m. on April 11, 2007 vote : top about a large small -- International online news (cotinine) : Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang on the 10th, said in Beijing China's Nansha Islands and their adjacent waters is indisputable sovereignty, any other country on the unilateral action taken by the waters of China's territorial sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction over violations, and is illegal and invalid. It is reported that the Vietnamese government to further delineate a part of Nansha oil and gas block tender, Nansha will be held in the so-called "Congress" election, Vietnam will be BP and British companies in the area of natural gas pipeline construction. During the day's routine press conference, Qin Gang, this response to a reporter's question, said that Vietnam in the Nansha a series of new actions, violation of the leaders of both China and Vietnam on the sea reached important consensus, contrary to the "Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea", is not conducive to stability in the South China Sea. The Chinese side expresses serious concern, the Vietnamese side has made solemn representations." So, the situation is totally clear and the Chinese position is clear. According to the International law and Chinese constitution the proble will be solved. |
Apr 30, 2007 02:01 | |
![]() | Why do we not use force to resolve the problem of Vietnam? 1、Military strength is not enough? Absolutely not! If we fight with Vietnam, it won't be called as a campaign, just like a battle. We can see the result from 1988, Vietnam is very fragile. According to the "Global Security" magazine introduced: Vietnamese navy owns a number of 40,000 soldiers (including 27,000 marines). Navy equipments include two submarines, five frigates, five small frigates, more than 40 patrol/missiles boats, five minesweepers, eight minesweepers boats, six landing crafts and more than 30 small landing boats. Look at its strength. It's very easy for us to exterminate them. 2、We dare not? Someone said that now the U.S, Japan or even India become the background of Vietnam, so we estimated the strength, then give up? LOL~ China doesn't want to have war with Vietnam, coz we would like to give him a chance. The last chance for him to wake up. If he continues to be unrepentant, i'm sorry. Goodbye, Vietnam! |
May 3, 2007 04:28 | |
![]() | Yes, Johnny China is much stronger than Vietnam. Vietnam is like a Chinese province. But what is the result from 1988? |
May 5, 2007 09:38 | |
![]() | War is no answer. Suggestions that China should use force are what frightens many other nations. So then they increase their military because of big bad China (in this case) and we have military escalation. Lets learn from the Taiwan situation. No longer are there any gunboat exercises, instead we see win-win economic co-operation. |
Page 2 of 2 < Previous Next > Page:
Post a Reply to: Should China use force to re-take Nansha Islands?