Private guns in American families | |
---|---|
Nov 15, 2007 21:21 | |
| Quote: "As Griz has said in other posts they need them for protection from animals and to deter crime. " Alan, it is not a good way to own private guns to deter crime. There are a lot of gun-related crimes in America. If everyone around you has a gun, you would not feel safe. Last year, the Vice President of USA Cheney mis-shoot a man and claimed that he mistook the man as a bird. Interesting! Mike, In America, gun ownership is a very special issue. I have ever heard that many individual states tried to deplete the high levels of gun ownership. However, there are many different interest groups who are against the motion. In Bush Administration, the issue of gun ownership didn't make any progress since Bush himself has a close connection with amunition-producers. He represents the interest of ther interest group of munitioners. |
Nov 16, 2007 10:59 | |
| Guestkun makes some very rational observations. Individual liberty and personal responsibility are fundamental to US democracy. Whereas other governments around the world feel empowered to tamper with the rights and liberties of their citizens on the grounds of protecting people against themselves, in this case the US government is constrained by law not so to do. I do not live in the US, but I guess that most people there wish there were less guns in 'circulation', and are concerned about the level of gun crime. However, I suspect only a small minority of those people believe that the problem should be fixed by the government restricting the freedom of its law abiding citizens. I think it is probably true that the gun is a part of American Culture, but recoginising the very high number of guns per head of population, I also believe that US citizens who possess firearms for legitimate reasons, do so with a sense of responsibilty and maturity which would be difficult for the citizens of other nations to match, were they to enjoy the same liberty. The 'culture' is also one of familiarity and respect for the gun. I am glad that where I live, in the UK, we have a long tradition of mostly un-armed police officers, and relatively low levels of gun-crime. That has been achieved at the cost of substantial restrictions on personal liberty, generally accepted as a reasonable 'trade' by the population. Unfortunately the levels of gun crime are increasing, and increased restrictions on personal liberty seem unable to check the rise. I dearly hope we do not end up in the situation of having comparable levels of criminal gun use to the US, but where law abiding citizens have sacrificed most of their personal liberty losing the battle! |
Nov 19, 2007 15:01 | |
| >>>However, so many guns owned by the average people did cause great loss for Americans. Every year, numerous people fell victims to the private guns. This is a misleading statement. Guns owned by law-abiding, taxpaying citizens cause very little harm. Yes, there are gun accidents; but murder and armed robbery by good people is very rare. For the most part, criminals with guns shoot and kill other criminals and less frequently - innocent people victimized in a crime. Gun crime in the US is highest in the cities and states with the most restrictions on firearms. The real reason gun crimes are a problem is that the American justice system sets criminals free to do more heinous acts. In Montana, USA many families feed themselves by killing deer and elk at this time of year for family meat. I just finished butchering one deer and will begin butchering a pronghorn antelope killed on my hunting trip. If I am fortunate, I will kill one or two more deer before hunting season ends. |
Nov 19, 2007 19:49 | |
| Gun is only a tool or force. It can be used for both good deeds and henious crime. The weapon itself is no fault. It depends on who hold the weapon in the hand. A rogue would use it to rob or kill people. A responsible citizen will use it for the purpose of defence. |
Nov 25, 2007 21:07 | |
| Griz326, Quote: "However, so many guns owned by the average people did cause great loss for Americans. Every year, numerous people fell victims to the private guns. This is a misleading statement. Guns owned by law-abiding, taxpaying citizens cause very little harm. Yes, there are gun accidents; but murder and armed robbery by good people is very rare." Acutually, it is not a misleading statement at all. The key is that numerous people actually were victimized by the private gun ownership. Law-abiding citizens are irrational frequently. |
Nov 26, 2007 22:21 | |
| Quote: >>One thing I can't stand is the world's perception of America being a bunch of cowboys running around with a six shooter strapped to their hip. When you come to America you may never see a gun on an average citizen<< GUEST40200, You mean that America's gun-toting family was not like the case described in the above pictures. Maybe, it is an overstatement of the case. However, it is said that every American has a gun on average. Is this true? |
Post a Reply to: Private guns in American families