Has capitalism failed? | |
---|---|
Oct 28, 2008 20:28 | |
| I think Dodge and Seth are with Conservatives. I didn't watch the debate between Mccain and Obama. However, I heard one word from McCain saying that he plans how to create money but Obama plans how to spend money in social security net. . I can imagine that if Obama made it, USA would be a slow and old nation where a mom with 3 children can live on childcare benefits instead of be a working mom. So I don't want to see the latter to take the office in the White House |
Jun 23, 2009 12:11 | |
| I have to respectfully disagree with Guest7360: capitalism, in rationale form, works fine. But the greed and stupidity that ruined the economic sector by destroying the housing market through poorly structured loans was an outgrowth of the Clinton years and Barney Frank and Chris Dodd; it had nothing to do with capitalism. There have been 15 recessions since the Great Depression, and capitalism (human innovation and hard work) has helped the recovery each time. With Obama and his despotic socialist agenda, the USA might not recover for a long time. Quadrupling the deficit is insane; socialized medicine (see the UK and Canada) is insane; killing investors and favoring unions is insane. Over-regulation leads to zero growth and zero incentive. I'm a Jeffersonian at heart I suppose: fear your government! Any government strong enough to GIVE you everything is also strong enough to TAKE IT AWAY. I am really worried about the next 4 years. |
Jun 24, 2009 20:01 | |
| McCain is too old to take the adventure. Unfortunately, there is no younger republican who is couragerous enough to stand out to clear out the shit. |
Jun 29, 2009 20:22 | |
| As a host of popular Shanghai talk show said, from financial and economic developemnt perspective, US get adult disease that infant or child is impossible to have, it's like that children or infants are unlikely to have venereal disease. |
Jun 29, 2009 21:28 | |
| Quote:Originally Posted by MARRIE As a host of popular Shanghai talk show said, from financial and economic developemnt perspective, US get adult disease that infant or child is impossible to have, it's like that children or infants are unlikely to have venereal disease.Marrie, nice input! I like this analogy. Compared with USA, China remains an infant or child in terms of financial and economic power despite of its rapid growth in the recent years. China's market economy is far from mature. There are still relatively too much state interference in the economy. Well, generally, I think China's 'socialism' (Socialism with Chinese Characteristics) have been working well over the 30 years. I have heard that the West nicknamed " China's theory of buidling socialism with Chinese characteristics" as "Neo-capitalism. Admittedly, China has learnt a lot from the West and Capitalism. China deserves much credit for its fast lasting economic growth. Therefore, the two systems both have their frailties and imperfections; and both have their advantages that the other should learn from. I think USA(Obama) has become well-conscious of this point, hence its "Change" catchphrase. Right, China is an infant, but infant signifies hope and future. |
Post a Reply to: Has capitalism failed?