Menu
Chinese-Japanese relationship
Nov 20, 2005 14:21
#71  
  • PINETREE
  • Points: 2514
  • Join Date: Oct 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
Read my messages again - u are putting words inmy mouth . Nobody said that u are from the USA. Nobody said that I have soooo many Japanese friends - just a couple of good ones.
Don't get yourself muddled up. U still deserve that slap.
Nov 20, 2005 14:22
#72  
  • ELCABRON
  • Points:
  • Join Date: Feb 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
Dont worry, my final Diploma work (=master degree in the US) was an empirical study.....
Nov 20, 2005 14:29
#73  
  • PINETREE
  • Points: 2514
  • Join Date: Oct 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
Ur last message speaks vlume of yourself. Hahaha ! I can see what stuff u are made off - tofu.
Nov 20, 2005 14:37
#74  
  • ELCABRON
  • Points:
  • Join Date: Feb 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
Again, my final words on a useless discussion with Pinetree:

The resumee of the latest posts is the following:

Japanese are "animals", "militant" and "Japan is again raring her militant head like a viper". Nations and characters never change, they keep the same since 60 years......and of course they "look down on China and try to slow down the progress in China"........any diplomatic talking is "not useful".....

Reading those lines lines I wonder where the "progress" is - certainly not in common sense of those who wrote these lines;-)

Kids, read my forum from the beginning and maybe you become clear in your mind....

But what else should I say, reading your cheap lies, everybody else can judge your mental state.
Nov 20, 2005 14:56
#75  
  • ELCABRON
  • Points:
  • Join Date: Feb 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
One last additional post to Pinetree:

Who was talking to you? Do you really think my answer was for you? I dont care for a weird mind like you. The empirical study refers to Woccas sentences of scientific working....not for a narrowminded, blind hatred spitting little kid like you.

So you have Japanese friends and call them animals....;-)
Nov 20, 2005 18:54
#76  
  • PINETREE
  • Points: 2514
  • Join Date: Oct 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
I have lost interest in you, Elcarbon.
U are not worth my debating with. U are shallow, confused, personal and cannot detach yourself from the matter that you are debating about. I feel sorry for you.
Study hard and hope that you can pick up something from your study there and something from your debates with me here.
Good luck & enjoy.

PS - don't try opening your mouth again without thinking like this case. U might get another slap - no, not from me again ( it will stain my hand ) but from someone else.
Nov 20, 2005 19:43
#77  
  • SNOWBIRD
  • Points:
  • Join Date: Oct 16, 2005
  • Status: Offline
Hey! Pinetree...Let me say a few honest words. I will be fair. I won't side with anybody.

You are right to say that the Japanese are animals when they caused so much sufferings to us. You are actually being kind to them by calling them animals. If barbarian is a better word, I will use it on them.

and Hey, Elcabron...you can called the Japs anything you like. But don't find fault with Pinetree for using the term animals on them. Your arguments stinks!! Kids?? You are a dumb kid.

OK. Like I say, I am being fair. I am not siding with anybody.
Nov 20, 2005 20:21
#78  
  • GAZ07
  • Points:
  • Join Date: Apr 27, 2005
  • Status: Offline
Fair? That was about as fair as a President Mugabe election! If your going to pretend to be fair, at least don't insult one of them!

My granded suffered hell in Africa during WW2 and i understand how you feel. I think you and Pinetree are correct to condemn those Japanese SOLDIERS and LEADERS who committed those atrocious crimes as Animals, Barbarians and i will add... BRUTAL INHUMANE DOGS, they are the crap on my shoe!!

But Elcabron is also correct when he says you shouldn't say ALL Japanese people (which your previous posts suggest) are Barbarians. You should not stereotype a whole nation by the actions of some of them. A 10 year old Japanese girl is completely innocent of those crimes so please do not condemn her.

I think that is what you were both trying to explain and you are both right. So for the sake of TCG....

PEACE!

Nov 20, 2005 20:41
#79  
  • PINETREE
  • Points: 2514
  • Join Date: Oct 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
I think that one must realise that TCG is about China. Anyone raising a post that could cause controversy has to be done with caution. Passionate response can be expected. In this post, the very people connected with harms inflicted are here. So don't start such posts and expect participants to be that neutral. Infact, a sensible 3rd party should avoid raising such issues here. If u wanna raise, then just listen - nothing else.
Trust that this is clear.
Nov 21, 2005 02:40
#80  
  • ELCABRON
  • Points:
  • Join Date: Feb 9, 2005
  • Status: Offline
To those two clones without identity and any clue:

1. Chinese-Japanese relationships certainly deal with China.

2. Passionate responses are welcome, but calling names on a complete nation("animals"), threatening people with "slapping", or ignoring facts (Japan is a major partner for direct investment in China - they neither look down on China nor do they slow down economical progress and they especially have no major expenses in building up an army) is just a lack of common sense.

3. Dont tell me to shut up, especially not if a "3rd party" has more knowledge of the topic than you yourself, according to your silly Japanese arguements...
PS: studying hard would have been good for you,too, it is a pitty you never did;-)

It is funny to see that some people really feel strong hiding anonymously behind a screen. I wonder if you would try to slap me standing in front ot me....
But I would give you a try;-)
Page 8 of 12    < Previous Next >    Page:
Post a Reply to: Chinese-Japanese relationship
Content: ( 3,000 characters at most, please )
You can add emoticons below to your post by clicking them.
characters left
Name:    Get a new code